Q: Some scientists, such as Sir Roger Penrose, have talked about neurons as quantum systems. yeago works Blog Archive Jesus, Buddha, Ken Wilber?? Right now they use a key that's based on the products of large prime numbers, and no computer could determine the prime factors in a time shorter than the age of the universe. The main thing to know is that "observation" is a bad word for the process which goes on which we have inherited from the days when quantum mechanics was first discovered, and is unfortunately a bit easier to teach in introductory courses than decoherence. Krauss discussed his criteria ln our interview last week. Author, speaker, and award-winning Writer/Director/Producer Mark Vicente was part of the creative team behind the sleeper hit "What The Bleep Do We Know?!". It went on to say that "Most laypeople cannot tell where the quantum physics ends and the quantum nonsense begins, and many are susceptible to being misguided," and that "a physics student may be unable to convincingly confront unjustified extrapolations of quantum mechanics," a shortcoming which the authors attribute to the current teaching of quantum mechanics, in which "we tacitly deny the mysteries physics has encountered". A movie and a book said that water molecules are. What the #$*! Do We (K)now!? (2004) - IMDb Amanda is a photographer, who seems to be highly skilled but not very successful professionally. [16], David Albert, a philosopher of physics who appears in the film, has accused the filmmakers of selectively editing his interview to make it appear that he endorses the film's thesis that quantum mechanics is linked with consciousness. At the end of this article, Dr Simons invites readers to explore the limitations of their own brains. Science Monitor has expired. Hagelin might be crazy, but some of those papers are co-written by John Ellis and other respectable people. Even though there's lots of proof that the Moon landing happened, some people don't . It's used as an excuse to be even weirder. On August 1, 2006 What the Bleep! This movie agrees with the scientists as far as the existence of the so called empty space is concerned. Our mind has enormous potential, but we only use a small part of it for conscious thought, and we miss a lot of what's going on around us. As he told ABC's "This Week" the day after the debate: "When it . is god-awful. The question is, how far down the rabbit hole, do you wanna go? Reality is happening in our brain all the time we're receiving it but it's not being integrated." And if you're a modern thinker you'll know for a fact that quantum physics is wacky stuff. Many religions and spiritual paths--from Hinduism, with its concept of maya, to Christian Science--teach that appearance is illusion. How to spot quantum quackery - NBC News I'm always up for a good New Age flick, even one masquerading as a documentary. Your subscription to Both are indeed mysterious, and their genuine mystery needs none of the hype with which this film relentlessly and noisily belabours us", concluding that the film is "tosh". During the Fall of the year Amanda begins to see the world in new and different ways when she begins to question her role in life, her relationships with her career and men and what it all means. "[15], Bernie Hobbs, a science writer with ABC Science Online, explains why the film is incorrect about quantum physics and reality: "The observer effect of quantum physics isn't about people or reality. Publishers Weekly What the Bleep Do We Know!? ), is hooked on prescription pills, and mopes about while her chirpy roommate spatters paint around their apartment. [7], According to Publishers Weekly, the film was one of the sleeper hits of 2004, as "word-of-mouth and strategic marketing kept it in theaters for an entire year." Supported by groups like the Templeton Foundation, legitimateor more creative scientists are exploring the mind-body connection, or the similarities between particle-and-wave physics and certain religious concepts like the Trinity. The meditation may not have helped the victims of violent crime, but it did win Hagelin the 1994 Ig Nobel Peace Prize. "The movie is saying that somehow we can all get together and, with our collective thought processes, we can influence the outcome" of physical events - be they life experiences or scientific. The web makes all such things available today, so I can give you a Google link to a page about Maharishis unified field theory, http://www.worldpeaceendowment.org/invincibility/invincibility6.html. And you'd do the study without knowing what had been 'said' to the water specimens, so your subjective opinions wouldn't colour the results. But above a tiny size range, quantum properties collapse, and particles start to behave in the way described by classical physics - more like bowling balls than fuzzy clouds of "wave functions. !" is a radical departure from convention. Your session to The Christian 1. "Physical reality is absolutely rock solid, yet it only comes into existence when it bumps up against another piece of physical reality like us, or a rock." Fred Allen Wolf Next factoid: Crime in Washington, D.C. was reduced 25 percent by prayer--and made believers of the D.C. cops! Cast. But are there new, weird applications that people might see that have an impact on everyday life, beyond the woo-woo? One should take seriously the danger that hes not the only one deluding himself. And any Cognitive Behavioural Therapist can help us to change the way we see things by changing our thought patterns. And we are certainly not isolated from the rest of the world. But when animated, jive-talkin' human cells start dancing around in what appears to be the heroine's frontal lobe, all questions of spirituality pale before the sheer dreadfulness of this movie. Real news, real hope. Amit Goswami (PhD) in What the Bleep Do We Know?. It took a while, but the comparison finally came through on the association of strings, as a quantum mechanical perspective, and the relationship to that movie. As the sample size grows, so does the scientist's confidence in the statistical inferences drawn from the large sample. Moon landing conspiracy theories aren't true - here's how we know The fact that someone who spouts such utter nonsense can get a Ph.D. from Harvard and be one of the most widely cited authors on supersymmetric models is pretty remarkable. Then we segue to a narrative starring Amanda (Marlee Maitlin), a wedding photographer who's bummed because her slimy husband cheated on her. He says he is "profoundly unsympathetic to attempts at linking quantum mechanics with consciousness".[1]. It'd be like being the CEO of a massive company and having to listen to what every single employee was doing every minute of every day. Monitor journalism changes lives because we open that too-small box that most people think they live in. PDF Hidden Messages In Water Our mind has enormous potential, but we only use a small part of it for conscious thought, and we miss a lot of what's going on around us so, in a leap of creatively edited logic 3. With Marlee Matlin, Elaine Hendrix, Barry Newman, Armin Shimerman. But when the ramblings about quantum physics start merging with fridge magnet philosophy, it's time for a little reality checking. The general idea was that since quantum mechanics supposedly says that there isnt one reality, but an infinite number of possibilities, one just has to be enlightened to an awareness of this, and then you can make whatever you want happen. She does play a large role in the movie and you can read all about her nonsense here. What the bleep Do we know ( 1080p) 3. Joe Dispenza "I think the point is that Feynman realized that people can be fooled, but nature can't.". Prominent if you go by citations that is. One other area where quantum mechanics works on a macroscopic scale is in superconductivity and superfluidity. and What the #$*! Z. Knight and heavily features commentary from 'Ramtha', an ancient Atlantian general who is apparently speaking through Knight. Initially, the film was released in only two theaters: one in Yelm, Washington (the home of the producers, which is also the home of Ramtha), and the other the Bagdad Theater in Portland, Oregon, where it was filmed. You are free to comment as you wish. In one experiment, people who were walking across a college campus were asked by a stranger for directions. "Your mind can't tell the difference between what it sees and what it remembers" Dr Joseph Dispenza (Chiropractor ) in What the Bleep Do We Know? The reason you should be suspicious is because we don't even understand classical consciousness. 'What the Bleep Do We Know?' : An insult to science and spirituality Staff meetings are tedious enough give me a conscious mind with a decent filter device any day. Andrew B Newberg, (MD, Radiologist), in What the Bleep Do We Know? 2) "What the Bleep Do We Know" has sure got a lot of people talking and thinking. I was really impressed and although it sounded totally crazy, the Einsteinian language that their brochures were using had nearly convinced me that they really know something about fundamental physics. He is also the theologian in residence of RSE. Quantum mechanics is crazy, but it's just crazy enough to make the world still be sensible at a macroscopic level, the level that we experience. Magician and skeptic James Randi, famous for debunking performers like Uri Geller, has offered his standard prize of $1 million cash money to Dr Emoto if he can get the same results when doing the water study this way. Pingback: Not Even Wrong Blog Archive Down the Rabbit Hole. As a series of scientists and scientist types take a wayward stab at explaining quantum theory -- it seems to involve being in two places at once -- "What the Bleep," which opens nationwide today . Intercut with these metaphysical ponderings is a soapy fictional narrative starring Marlee Matlin as a broken-hearted photographer. With Alejandro Jodorowsky, Horacio Salinas, Zamira Saunders, Juan Ferrara. Featuring interviews with scientists and theologians, this compelling film thrusts the viewer into a world where science and spirituality intersect. The minds boggle | Science | The Guardian Photos View All Photos Movie Info Amanda, a divorced photographer, has a fantastic experience when life begins to unravel around her, revealing the cellular,. "What the Bleep" begins in NOVA-like fashion: galaxies swirl and scientists--we aren't told who they are until the end--expound on quantum mechanics and the nature of the universe. Tags: science-and-technology, neuroscience, physics. The part where the scientist put water under a microscope that was sitting under the label "I hate you" or "I want to kill you" Looked distorted and dirty but water blessed by monks was uniform and beautiful. There appears to be no evidence to support this claim. Check out this great listen on Audible.com. kazakore (kazakore) January 14, 2010, 6:30pm #10 Mark was born in Johannesburg, South Africa . Use these social-bookmarking links to share What the bleep are they on about?. Since its release in April 2004, this independent film has become a cult hit, playing to packed houses and grossing over $7.5 . The comments focus primarily on a single theme: "We create our own reality." And most thoughtful members of the "spiritual but not religious" camp would take issue if you chopped off their big toes and then responded to their complaints with a lofty "it's all in your mind." And while I'm no quantum physicist, my yoga teacher a big fan of the movie was starting to sound like she was. What the Bleep Do We (K)now!? Online Trivia | W | 10 Questions If he says hes being misrepresented, I quite believe him. VISiT http://docsubtitles.blogspot.comsubscribe to watch full moviecheck also short trailer http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lJOrsql3KwU According to Joo Magueijo, professor in theoretical physics at Imperial College, the film deliberately misquotes science. John Haglin What the (Bleep) Were They Thinking? - Skeptico Particles are fluctuations the rules of physics say it's perfectly fine for them to exist at some time and/or place and to be non-existent at another time and/or place. I was expecting something pretty dumb, but am always interested to see what people think about quantum mechanics. The movie "What the Bleep do we know" How much is true, or just entertainment. When they use the word 'observe', they actually mean 'interact with', not look at or think about.). Professor Clive Greated wrote that "thinking on neurology and addiction are covered in some detail but, unfortunately, early references in the film to quantum physics are not followed through, leading to a confused message". I started out thinking that BLEEP 2 would be a ground-breaking update covering ideas and discoveries in quantum physics, brain neurology and consciousness studies introduced over a decade ago. For starters you'd have to take a lot of samples from different parts of each ice specimen. 19802023 The Christian Science Monitor. What the Bleep Do We Know!? Quantum physics doesn't need them to. If you have questions about your account, please That's why we experience a classical world. I guess it's a sign that quantum physics is entering the mainstream A: Well, yeah, the point is that there have been these new-age desires for lots of things to make the world better: crystals, energy vortices. But that doesn't mean that astrology is true. About. presents a viewpoint of the physical universe and human life within it, with connections to neuroscience and quantum physics. Marlee Matlin, Barry Newman, Elaine Hendrix. What the Bleep Do We Know!? The idea that our own perceptions can't be trusted is not new, of course. And wait-the human body is mostly water! John Hagelin was obviously a good phenomenologists. Easton's 1897 Bible Dictionary. Yet, the battle still ranges, and we now know where we can class the distinctions of LQG and String theorists? Unfortunately, it also completely misunderstands it. In addition, the film mentioned clipper ships which were not even in existence at that time. Interspersed with Amanda's woes and the pseudoscience are random attacks on organized religion. My main objection is to the "blessed water" segment which was utter bull****, but the rest of the movie is ok and is designed to start people . This will be revisited if any. What The Bleep Do We Know DEBUNKED., page 2 "Contrary to ordinary beliefs, quantum physics is very predictive," Dr. de Gouva continues. Fred Alan Wolf, PhD in What the Bleep Do We Know? "[5] The same article quotes Bill Pfau, Advertising Manager of Inner Traditions, as saying "More and more ideas from the New Age community have become accepted into the mainstream. But we behave like classical objects for a reason: We're big, we have lots of particles, they interact. Hambling says it is likely that both the Hughes account and the story told by Pert were exaggerations of the records left by Captain Cook and the botanist Joseph Banks. "The protagonist, Amanda, played by Academy Award-Winning actress Marlee Matlin, finds herself in a fantastic Alice in Wonderland experience when her daily, uninspired life literally begins to unravel, revealing the uncertain world of the quantum field hidden behind what we consider to be our normal, waking reality. Do We Know!? Particles embracing all possible states until they are forced by an experiment to assume one state, one particle being in two adjacent places simultaneously, the inability to precisely measure a particle's position and momentum at the same time - these are just a few of the weird manifestations of quantum physics. They may applaud the central tenets of the movie, but not its disjointed narrative, clunky acting, bizarre thematic segues, and faux "facts." In the documentary segments of the film, interviewees discuss the roots and meaning of Amanda's experiences. "They take advantage of things we don't know very well or can't test very well, then use it in an unfair way," notes Andr de Gouva, a particle physicist at Northwestern University in Evanston, Ill. Dr Emoto takes photos of crystals formed in freezing water.