how the proposed research contributes to or helps maintain the health of other research disciplines, contributes to addressing key UK societal challenges, contributes to current or future UK economic success or enables future development of key emerging industries, the extent to which the research proposed has the potential to meet national strategic needs by establishing or maintaining a unique world-leading research activity (including areas of niche capability). Sub-contracting costs can be claimed as an exception to bring in non-standard expertise and is relevant to research and help further the partnership but it needs to be distinguished from a co-investigator. Your project should typically last one to three years. If you plan to use a major facility in your research, such as those funded centrally by EPSRC or a European facility, contact the facility before applying to EPSRC to check if your proposed research is feasible, and obtain a technical assessment if Je-S marks it as required. You should comment explicitly on this aspect of the proposal and where possible give your view of where this work would sit in relation to related activity internationally, and the extent to which it would provide the UK with a unique capability. The scale may also vary significantly, depending on the focus of the award. As part of the impact assessment, reviewers comment on whether a collaboration is appropriate; therefore, a good project partner letter of support shows that the collaboration is genuine, and explains why the project partner supports the project. Wellcome Trust Research Fellow in Coventry . Institutions are required to offer a high level of support to fellows. As an internationally collaborative grant, particular attention should be paid to standard conditions 2.6.1 and 2.6.2. CVs, not exceeding two A4 sides each, should be submitted as separate attachments using Attachment Type CV in Je-S, and are only required for named research staff or visiting researchers. This will populate: council: EPSRC; document type: standard proposal; scheme: standard Please note that while the criteria headings mirror EPSRCs standard criteria, additional aspects have been added to the applicant and partnerships and resources and management criteria, and the applicant and partnerships criterion has been made a primary criterion. The NIA is an individual award which is intended to support the principal investigator in developing research independence, and the proposal should be developed accordingly. Capitalising on clusters of design excellence, Green Transition Ecosystems (GTEs) are large scale projects that focus on translating the best design-led research into real-world benefits. For example: University of Nairobi; Kenya; Other Directly Incurred Costs; Subcontracting of the production of samples. Applicants have been advised that their applications should be based on the information available at the point of submission and, if applicable, the known application specific impacts of COVID-19 should be accounted for. The aim of the scheme is to support them in establishing a research group and developing their own research vision. Therefore, you should not use journal impact factor (or any hierarchy of journals), conference rankings and metrics such as the H-index or i10-index when assessing UKRI grants. Applicants must comply with the standard EPSRC terms for eligibility to hold research grants . how the research fits with and complements other UK research already funded in the area or related areas, including the relationship to the EPSRC portfolio and our stated strategy set out in our portfolio. EPSRC new investigator award. For multidisciplinary applications please state which aspects of the application you feel qualified to assess. Reference MED03699. For more information see host organisation statement for New Investigator Award. There is no simple definition of excellence. Sample Submission: 13 December 2023 Outline Deadline: 29 March 2023 Full Proposal Deadline: 13 June 2023 . Apply for funding to initiate or develop new international partnerships with researchers overseas and to tackle the challenges faced by developing countries.. Any investigators who do not have a Je-S account must register for one at least 7 working days before the opportunity deadline. Trusted research and innovation is a UKRI work programme designed to support cross-sector campaigns that protect all those working in our thriving and collaborative international sector. In recent years, we have witnessed impressive developments in the mathematical modelling of complex physiological systems. Beyond the immediate use-case of CNNs for automation, there is an opportunity to leverage the internal representations learned by CNNs to perform large-scale data mining and support biological discovery. The New Investigator Award scheme (which replaces the First Grant scheme) includes a number of changes from the previous scheme of which researchers who are considering applying should be aware.. We expect the level of funding to vary but be appropriate to the proposed research programme. We will not accept uninvited resubmissions of projects that have been submitted to UKRI or any other funder. You should comment here on the adequacy and appropriateness of this proposed university contribution. Research grants are open to UK higher education institutions, research council institutes, UKRI-approved independent research organisations, Public Sector Research Establishments and NHS bodies with research capacity. Under the NIA scheme, funding is typically sought for 10% to 20% of the principal investigators time. We encourage you to contact us first to discuss your proposal if you believe your research may cross research council boundaries. For visiting researchers, include details of previous visits or collaborations with overseas researchers. The New Investigator Award scheme (which replaces the First Grant scheme) includes a number of changes from the previous scheme of which researchers who are considering applying should be aware.. The reviewer form asks reviewers to comment on the national importance of the research. This makes it easier for the panel to assess how complete and convincing the applicants responses are. how competitive the proposed work is and how it compares to related international activity, whether the applicants show how their research fits with activities elsewhere in the world and whether they demonstrate awareness of the context and landscape within which they operate, to what extent the research will provide the UK with a unique capability, whether the applicant has presented the academic, industrial, policy, societal or other relevant context clearly. This opportunity will transition from Je-S to a new Funding Service after 30 March 2023. Post base: Office-based/Non Office-based (see job hazard analysis) Job purpose. UKRI must receive your application on Je-S by 30 March 2023 4:00pm UK time. Thoroughly researched, expertly written, and styled accordingly. We understand that in some research areas it might be more appropriate to request up to 35%, however anything above this would be more appropriate in standard mode. Your comments, scores and confidence level should explicitly reflect your views on those aspects you can assess, and you are asked not to moderate these in any way to reflect those areas you feel you cannot comment on. Complete the intention to submit form on Smart Survey. There are 2 parallel funding routes to this funding opportunity: The full economic cost of your project can be up to 200,000 with a duration of up to 2 years. You can save completed details in Je-S at any time and return to continue your application later. Epsrc New Investigator Award Cover Letter - 964 . The international academic project partners must also have an integral role in the proposed work. Frequently asked questions and webinar questions (PDF, 420KB). Stage one. Universities should pay particular attention to ensure that the new investigator is properly supported and mentored through their supervision of the student, and that adequate attention is paid to the training of both the student and the investigator. When you submit the application, it will first go to your host organisation for review. Total Price. Where two or more applications have been formally linked to form a single research project, you are requested to submit a single review covering the project as a whole. University support should not necessarily involve covering part of the cost of the grant but could include: provision of dedicated laboratory space (or equivalent); provision of materials, equipment or facility access; mentoring and professional guidance. EPSRC staff offer their hints and tips on writing strong funding applications and tackle some of the common misconceptions around applying for EPSRC funding. Posted on 14 February 2018. The outcome of the application will not affect the applicants eligibility to apply for the NIA scheme. UKRI staff will use this information to understand: Full proposals will be assessed by an expert panel. You should comment on how clearly this is described, how appropriate it is for the planned activities, and their scientific and technical feasibility. Press release issued: 11 March 2020. This document is the principal opportunity to explain to reviewers . . . Select 'call search'. * SFI (Ireland) FNR . The reviewer form asks reviewers to summarise their view of the application. Your assessment should be based solely on the resources sought and not on the costs derived from them. This funding opportunity is also subject to our policy on repeatedly unsuccessful submissions. covering letter describing how your experience and career history fit with the guidance on eligibility: not seen by peer review, no page limit. A full justification for your assessment of the application should be provided. Find out more about providing declarations of interest. A significant grant is usually defined as including more than 6 months of postdoctoral research associate (PDRA) time, capital equipment in excess of 20,000, or in excess of 100,000 full economic costing on 1 individual grant. Industrial cooperative award in science and technology (CASE) studentship, early career researcher capital block grant, EPSRC studentship (through doctoral training partnerships or centres for doctoral training), information and communication technologies. It is also a helpful technique to raise issues or concerns with the application in the form of explicit questions for the applicants. You should ensure you are aware of and follow any internal institutional deadlines that may be in place. Panels are organised by theme and meet at different times of the year. ID 19673. whether the proposal demonstrates that the applicants have the expertise and capabilities to deliver the project. EPSRC Reference: EP/W028905/1: Title: Aviation-to-Grid: Grid flexibility through multiscale modelling and integration of power systems with electrified air transport . This will help applicants build an in-depth knowledge of our peer review processes and principles, helping you to further increase your knowledge of reviewing and proposal writing. the ideas, concepts and approaches proposed and any particularly strong or weak examples within the programme, whether the applicant has provided clear aims and objectives for the technical programme, and how they will monitor their achievements. Read the, the spread of applications across EPSRCs remit, the novelty, relationship to the context, timeliness and relevance to identified stakeholders, the ambition, adventure, transformative aspects or potential outcomes, the suitability of the proposed methodology and the appropriateness of the approach to achieving impact. Questions can be submitted prior to the event using the EPSRC international team email address or during the webinar using the question and answer function. The prompts are given as a reminder of those issues that are likely to be most significant in determining the overall merit of an application. EPSRC New Investigator Award for Dr Meghan Halse. The following information takes an ESRC Standard Grant application as a template but the information is also applicable to other funders. Projects made up of multiple proposals have additional guidance. an early career researcher who meets the eligibility requirements of the EPSRC New Investigator Award scheme. Encourage a greater degree of university support to aid career development. Case for support, totalling up to eight A4 sides, comprising up to two A4 sides for a track record, and six A4 sides describing proposed research and its context. support for full economic costs greater than 100,000. is based at a UK research organisation eligible for EPSRC funding. Flexible working includes, but is not limited to, reduction in full-time hours, long-term partial return to work, job sharing, compressed working hours, term-time only working, annualised hours. So nothing is missed, EPSRC recommends that you follow the Cost to the Proposal headings used in the application form. Reviewers are requested to comment on the degree of research excellence of the proposal, making reference to three key aspects: Applicants are asked to set their proposal in context, in terms of the current state of knowledge and other work under way in the field.